While my previous blog post was about the Cambridge word of the year for 2025, this post will reflect on words of the year from three other sources: Oxford, Collins and Merriam-Webster. Not surprisingly, all three dictionaries chose words related to online activities.
Oxford
University Press announced that “rage bait” was its top choice for the year, an
expression referring to online content intended to provoke anger by being irritating
or sounding taboo, for the purpose of increasing hits or enhancing interaction
on specific sites or social media accounts. Rage bait works through provocative
framing, rather than facts; creating false dilemmas; and de-contextualizing or exaggerating
normal situations. An example would be posting a video clip of someone shouting
to insinuate that that is their regular style, when it is, in fact, a one-off. Rage
bait often succeeds because it quickly incites emotions, increasing comments
and shares while exploiting people’s differences and alliances, ultimately
boosting engagement metrics for the concerned online platforms. Though similar
in meaning to an older term, “click bait”, it distinguishes itself by eliciting
anger.
Oxford’s
runner up for the year 2025 was “aura farming”, focusing on the impression you
make online: projecting charisma and strength or appearing cool as part of an
impressive public image, which naturally could be divorced from reality. In any
case, it always involves a deliberate effort. Humorous examples that come to
mind would be adjusting your sunglasses while indoors or pretending to text
while actually opening your calculator. Other scenarios could involve walking
slowly towards the camera or trying different poses.
Collins
found “vibe coding” to be the most important expression of the year, referring
to “the use of AI prompted by natural language to assist with the writing of
computer code”. According to the dictionary, the term was made popular by Andrej Karpathy, the former Director of AI at Tesla and the founding engineer at OpenAI. He used it to reflect how AI encourages creativity while saving users the hassle of writing code themselves. An example in creative writing would be prompting an AI to create a character that is simultaneously manic and autistic.
Merriam-Webster’s
chosen term “slop” is defined as “digital content of low quality that is
produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence”. It may be
linked to last year’s “brain rot”, but with special emphasis on large quantities
and AI involvement. It may also draw on the above concepts of rage bait,
clickbait, and aura farming, while being generated through vibe coding.

No comments:
Post a Comment